Question: indirect cost analysis of medical equipment manufacturing costs background a...
INDIRECT COST ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING COSTS
A portable sterilizing unit, PS6, was introduced recently to the market. It utilizes nitrogen dioxide (NO2) gas as the sterilant. This unit sterilizes and makes available at the bedside some of the reusable instruments that nurses and doctors usually obtain by walking to or receiving delivery from a centralized area. The PS6 unit makes the instruments available at the point and time of use for burn and severe wound patients who are in a regular patient room.
There are two models of PS6 available. The standard version sells for $10.75, and a premium version with customized trays and a battery backup system sells for $29.75. The product has sold well to hospitals, convalescent units, and nursing homes at the level of about 1 million units per year.
The manufacturer, Health Care Services, has historically used an indirect cost allocation system based upon direct hours to manufacture for all its other product lines. The same was applied when PS6 was priced. However, Arnie, the
person who performed the indirect cost analysis and set the sales price, is no longer at the company, and the detailed analysis is no longer available. Through e-mail and telephone conversations, Arnie said the current price was set at about 10% above the total manufacturing cost determined 2 years ago, and that some records were available in the design department files. A search of these files revealed the manufacturing and cost information in Table 15–11. It is clear from these and other records that Arnie used traditional indirect cost analysis based on direct labor hours to estimate the total manufacturing costs of $9.73 per unit for the standard model and $27.07 per unit for the premium model.
Last year management decided to place the entire plant on the ABC system of indirect cost allocation. The costs and sales figures collected for the PS6 line the year before were still accurate. Five activities and their cost drivers were identified for the Health Care Services manufacturing operations (Table 15–12). Also, the volumes for each model are summarized in this table.
The ABC method will be used henceforth, with the intention of determining the total cost and price based on its results.
|TABLE 15–11||Historical Records of Direct and Indirect Cost Analyses for PS6|
|PS6 Direct Cost (DC) Evaluation|
|Model||Direct Labor, $/Unit1||Direct Material, $/Unit||Direct Labor, Hours/Unit||Total Direct Labor Hours|
|PS6 Indirect Cost (IDC) Evaluation|
|Model||Direct Labor, Hours/Unit||Fraction IDC Allocated||Allocated IDC, $||Sales, Units/Year|
|1Average direct labor rate is $20 per hour.|
|TABLE 15–12||PS6 Activities, Cost Drivers, and Volume Levels for ABC-Based Indirect Cost Allocation|
|Activity||Cost Driver||Volume/Year||Actual Cost, $/Year|
|Purchasing||Purchase orders||40,000 orders||1,200,000|
|Scheduling||Change orders||1,000 orders||800,000|
|Production setup||Setups||5,000 setups||1,000,000|
|Machine operations||Machine hours||10,000 hours||1,200,000|
|Volume Level for the Year|
|Number of change orders||400||600|
If the prices and number of units sold are the same next year (750,000 standard and 250,000 premium), and all other costs remain constant, compare the profit from PS6 under the ABC method with the profit using the traditional indirect cost allocation method.