1. Business
  2. Economics
  3. summary writing thesis and main points six sentences only...

Question: summary writing thesis and main points six sentences only...

Question details

Opinion | An Urgent Call for Compromise in Venezuela- The New York Times Page I of 2 An Urgent Call for Compromise in Venezuela The risk of a winner-takes-all approach in the countrys political crisis is extraordinary, Its time to seek a negotiated transition By Franclsco Redrigver and Jeftrey D. Sachs Feb 22035 Over the past two weeks, the United States, with the support of several countries in Latin America, has recognized the government of Juan Guaids, the president of Venezuelas National Assembly, and given it control over the countrys ol revenues. By doing so, it has entered a dangerous gamie of chicken with the Veneruelan military: Abandon President Nicolás Maduro or face the devastation of the Venezuelan economy. The message is stark: Change regime or starve. The United States is acting with typical bravado, assuming that all will be over soon: Me. Maduro will leave, sanctions will be lifted are faling in line with the Trump administrations gambit The risks of this approach, however, are extraordinary. The United States government is making several assumptions: that the and Venezuela and the United States will benefit. Mr. Maduro is widely despised inside and outside Venezuela, so many countries military is on the verge of changing sides; that it will do so in a disciplined manner; that Mr. Maduro lacks popular support, that Venezuelas foreign allies, notably China, Cuba and Russia, lack the interest, will and means to support their ally; and that bygones will be hygones after a quick regime change These assumptions might prove to be correct, but could easily be incorrect. The Venezuelan military might prove to be hardened supporters of Mr. Maduro or splinter into pro-Maduro and anti-Maduro forces, Chavista popular forces might rally behind Chavismos leadership, despite pervasive starvation and hyperinflation. Civil violence could erupt. Mr. Maduros foreign allies might find the means to defend their own interests for example, their claims on Venezuelas oil-by supporting him or delaying regime change The United States track record of fomenting regime change is very poor. In Afghanistan, incredibly, it is negotiating a peace agreement with the Taliban after 18 years of a United States-led war to defeat the Taliban. Interventions in Iraq, Syria and Libya have also led to continuous strife. There is no guarantee that Venezuela would be any different. The spiral of violence and chaos could start imminently. By commandeering Venezuelas only lifeline to food supplies and oil field quipment, the United States has lit the fuse. By the Trump administrations own estimates, sanctions will cost Venezuelas economy result is likety to be an economic and humanitarian catastrophe of a dimension never seen in our hemisphere. We strongly urge an alternative approach, hased on seeking a peaceful and negotiated transition of power rather than a winner-take- in lost oil revenue in the next year, which is equal to 94 percent of what the country spent last year in goods imports. The all game of chicken. We start from the proposition that the people of Venezuela should not be the victims of a power struggle between Mr. Maduro and the opposition, nor between the external backers of the two sides As much as Mr. Maduros foes hate to admit, and indeed find repellent, Chavismo still carries some political weight in the society and g the mlitary, We therefore recommend a compromise solution rather than a fight to the tinish. One of us recently wrote about a key historical case Poland in 1989- where two bitter foes, the existing Communist regime and the opposition Solidarity movement, agreed to cohabit in the government for a two-year transition period until future presidential elections. Leaders in both the government and opposition in Venezuela have expressed interest in negotiations, yet each side is also being encouraged by outside allies to ride out the struggle without compromise. None of the foregoing is meant to excuse or deny the atrocious mismanagement of the country by the government of Nicolás Maduro, nor the serious evidence of multiple and systematic human rights violations by his forces. Yet we do not need to let the justifiable outrage at these abuses lead us blindly into a protracted conflict that could only increase the sufering of Venezuelans, What we need is an understanding that negotiation and compromise are key to a peaceful solution. 2/2/201 https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/02/opinion/venezuela-juan-guaido-maduro.html

Opinion | An Urgent Call for Compromise in Venezuela - The New York Times Page 2 of 2 arvation, miltions more retugees or polsical solutlons dictmed by outside forces. We beleve themselves. The United States could eventually get its a w suftering of millions of Venezuelans- beyond the great sflering to date that the world, and especialy the counstrys neighbors, should listen to Vesezuelans s way in a winnertake -all struggle, but at the grave risk of the extreme a first step, we recommend that Chavismo and opposition forces join to insist that the state-owned el company Petrüeos de Venvervelas earnings be put to the immediate di sposal of the Venervelan people for two urgent uses: tood and medicine, and ol fteld equipment and maimtenance to keep the Vemeeuelan econceny from eollapsing. The use of these funds should be guided by a joint cowmittee of the government and the National Assembly, with United Nations support. Mr.Gusidó, who has been handed Veneroelas oil earnings by United States decisions, should immediately suggest such a solution in the interest of the nations survival and peace Second, both sides should agree to an interim government of experts to help bring Venenuelas hyperiniation and economic collapse to an end. This interim government should have a fienited mandate for ecoeomic stabilization and recovery, to carry the nacion to new elections within one to two years. Leaders of the current government, possibly including Mr. Maduro, would play a limited and predetermined role in the interim goverement-for example retaining coetrol of national delense- but their powers would be circumscribed and would not include the economy and reform of the electoral system The agreement should also include the appointment of new independet electoral authorties, which would be tasked with rebuilding the countrys electoral institutions in order to make a free and fair election possible. The international community, backed by the United Nations Security Council, should support such stablization efforts and accept that elections would take place only after the end of the hyperinflation and the reforn o nditions are suitable electoral institutions, when social and political e Third, the cransition government and the framework for future elections should be based on respect for the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary, and the protection of haman rights Veneruclas neighbors, above all, should champion negotlation and compromise rather than winner-take-all politics Venezuelas recovery, healing and peace are the nations, and the regioos, most urgent needs Opinion Juan Guaide Juan Guaido: Venesuelans, Strength is in Unity 30 Opinion Michael Albertus Venezuelas Best Path to Democracy? Pay Off the Military . 3018 Opinion | Patrick Iber The US. Needs to Stay Out of Venezuels 31. 33s Francisco Rodriguer is chiet economist t Torino Economics Jetrey D. Sachs is Univensity Profenssor at Columibus Universlty he rimes is committed h, putistang & dversity o.etters to #細edtor. iled ike E heer what you think about ths r any pror articles. Here are som. Sps. And heres our ema: letters@nytimes com Fotlow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter i@rTopinion) and Instagram https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/02/opinion/venezuela-juan-guaido-maduro.html peacetui ana negreined trinnvon tt power rsther thao.. wiuner ute we strongly urge, an alternative appre ach, based on seeking We scart trom the proposition thae the r Maduro and the opposition, mor indeed find repenent. Chavim s among the military We therefore recormmend a compromise solution rather than & tight to thwa a key historical case Poland in 1989-where two bitter foes, the existing Cowmist regime anks the oppostlo movement, agreed to eohablt in the government for a two-year transition period unt future presidentlad elections to admit, and t ne of the foregoing is meant to excuse or deny the atrocious imismanagement of the country by the government of N duro, nor the serious evidence of multiple and systematic baman rights violations by this forces. Yet we cos nok need to lert urside allies to ride out the strugale without compromise ubuses lead us blindly into a peotracted conflict that could only increase the sutlesing of Venezuelans are key to a peacetal solution

summary writing , thesis and main points, six sentences only

Solution by an expert tutor
Blurred Solution
This question has been solved
Subscribe to see this solution